Churchill Lodge Forums

Divided Loyalties
Last Post 21 Dec 2012 04:50 AM by . 2 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
NextNext
Author Messages
JaxUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Posts:120

--
05 Apr 2010 03:21 PM QuoteQuote ReplyReply  

One of the considerations we had in forming Churchill (and the new MacArthur Lodge) was that there would naturally be some jealousy and some push-back from lodges that fear loss of members to the new groups, or loss of recruitment opportunities.

Clearly, a man cannot be in two places at once. Time spent with a new lodge is time away from the home lodge.

But I think this is 'good stress.'

Any gardener will tell you, the stress of pruning helps plants to grow. The stress of occasional dry periods forces deeper roots. The analogy is an apt one for Masonic Lodges:

Lodges have on average 20-25 positions of leadership or vigorous committeework. A full roster of workers beyond these positions is difficult to maintain, because the work is sporadic, or because our management structure doesn't allow easy growth beyond this size. Hence, bigger lodges tend to carry a lot of passive members. These men may attend events, but they are not required to attend by virtue of a task or office. These men may read the newsletter, or focus on an appendent body; good men who want to be involved will find an outlet for their energy. If we do not provide them a role at the blue lodge, we will lose them to other interests.

What happens when a successful lodge loses a few leaders? Typically, new brethren or sideliners will step to take the reins. My contention is that there are more of these men falling off each year in our good lodges, than are 'allowed' to step up into the ranks of the officers or key committee roles. The rather severe pruning that occurs when 'birthing' a new lodge then can be a shock for the original lodge. Leaders must prepare for this, and challenge back benchers to step forward. With the right planned transition, both groups will succeed, and in five years, we'll have two viable lodges, each with 20-25 positions of vital leadership.

Churchill has followed this model exactly. Now, about two years after formation, our mother lodges are still working to overcome the partial loss of some key members. But signs are there that several key young men have stepped up. We've found that the colonizers must make a diligent effort to reach back and assist in culture building for both lodges, lest the loss be too severe.

Divided loyalties, or the perception thereof, can be a real concern. I personally have seen instances where brethren of the older lodge have questioned where a colonizer's loyalties lie: with the mother lodge or the new lodge. It's crucial to focus on the lodge you are with while you are there. It can be very disruptive to discuss the new organization while at work at the old one. Even for a practiced veteran Mason, we need to be mindful of the impact of our words, and how we build culture by fully focusing on the lodge at hand. Influential leaders must watch for gaps where it is difficult to find someone to step up and take a role. Rathern than let a lodge fall down, the veteran should lend a hand. Eventually the gaps will be filled. Some new brother will learn the Staircase lecture or other difficult part. A crew of three or four friends will all step up to fill open officer positions. The back bench will become the starting lineup.

We'd suggest too, that a 'sideliner's night' strategy can be used to generate new ritual workers or officers. Lake Harriet Lodge uses this effectively, and more can be read about this at www.lodgebuilder.org.

As new lodge builders, we're engaged in making Masonry more viable as a long-term institution. I'm convinced that more small lodges are better than fewer large lodges. During the Churchill experiment, we touched on some sensitive issues. These cannot be allowed to derail the larger purpose of bringing more men into vital brotherhood roles, and building more engaged officers. Comments?

JaxUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Posts:120

--
13 May 2010 06:39 PM QuoteQuote ReplyReply  

My intent with Churchill is to foster participation and cross-pollination by a few key members into multiple lodges. It's harder than it looks... I've made a conscious decision to divide my time between my home lodge and the new lodge. Still, I know I'm not at one of them or the other as often as I would have been with a single membership. Brethren who join multiple lodges may indeed find they become a 'dues payer' at one, and an 'active participant' at the other.

I know of many men who move across the state or country, keep membership in their home, or mother lodge, and become active in a new place. They pay the bill, but out of loyalty, not from regular interaction.

It strikes me that this is human nature for a man. Example: I hope to remain a lifetime monogamist, but some secular commentators on marriage have declared (in the absence of the higher value set of God-based values) that humans in their natural state are 'serial monogamists.' While I reject any ethic that would give easy license to a man or woman to abandon a marriage simply for convenience or whim, still, there may be a kernel of truth in the idea that we males (females too) are wired to be loyal to one cause or object at a time: One wife, one job, one fraternal group. Multiple kids... Er, well, that derails the metaphor.

But I do notice myself thinking about my home lodge somewhat less often.

Is it reasonable to expect this core group of Churchill members - or any dual members - to maintain the full fervency of their fraternal zeal toward TWO lodges?  Can these remain equal objects d'affection?

Hmmm.

1
Posts:22

--
21 Dec 2012 04:50 AM QuoteQuote ReplyReply  
If all your family members are searching Louis Vuitton Handbags for a multi functional in depth nearly about if you value then all your family need to make a certain all your family search too going to be the is really a great to have going to be the headhunters. These days?many men and women need marketing jobs,Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet. There are several unique marketing jobs that can be the case was able to find providing some one some help from the Chicago marketing headhunters,Cheap Louis Vuitton Handbags.
It is this ach an absolute must have to educate yourself regarding be in contact yourself for more information regarding skillfull marketing headhunters as well as in Chicago,Louis Vuitton Canada. There are separate Chicago marketer headhunters during which time all your family members can submit your curriculum vitae Louis Vuitton Outlet.


Quick Reply
toggle
  Username:
Subject:
Body:
Security Code:
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below

Submit
Active Forums 4.1
NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com

 

Looking for a broader fraternal discussion?

You may enjoy the busy discussion forums at Lodgebuilder, a website managed by Thomas C. Jackson, a past grand master of Minnesota and founder of Churchill Lodge.

© Copyright 2011 by Sir Winston Churchill Lodge #351, under authority of the Grand Lodge of Minnesota   |    Privacy Statement   |    Terms Of Use    Login
);